George W. Bush As President
by Steffan Vanel 08/04
Here is the next installment in my on-going
interpretation of the Astrological Karma of George W. Bush. See my April
Column, May Column, June
Column, and July Column for the
first four installments of this series.
The next
section of this chapter will examine how George W. functions
as President. The various Astrological factors and
formative experiences we have identified can now be abserved
as they influence the choices and decisions George W. makes.
I confess, I did not vote for George W. Bush, and like all
humans I am subject to my own biases as I approach political
subjects. My skills as an Astrologer, however, have been honed
in application to clients whose political affiliation virtually
never enters the picture. I have tried to remain as fair and
as objective as I can in this analysis of our current president.
In this final section of Astrological analysis of George W.
Bush I am going to reference the book, ‘The Price of
Loyalty,’ by Ron Suskind. It details the experiences
and observations of Bush’s former Secretary of the Treasury,
Paul O’Neill. He served in prior Republican administrations
under Presidents George H.W. Bush, Gerald Ford, and Richard
Nixon. O’Neill worked closely with George W. Bush before
being dismissed from the cabinet in 2003. His record of public
service and Republican credentials make it difficult to dismiss
his account as either sour grapes or as liberal ravings.
I would
like to begin with O’Neill’s description
of the ‘behind the scenes’ White House buildup
to the present war in Iraq. Ten days after his Inauguration
in 2001, Bush held his first meeting with the National Security
Council. The first topic was the Arab/Israeli conflict. After
a short discussion Bush said “I don’t see much
we can do over there at this point. I think it’s time
to pull out of that situation.” The Secretary of State,
Colin Powell, tried to point out that such a hasty exit would
likely unleash Ariel Sharon and the Israeli army on the Palestinians.
O’Neill noted, ‘Bush shrugged. “Maybe that’s
the best way to get things back in balance.”
O’Neill described Powell’s
reaction as startled.
Bush then
turned to Condoleeza Rice and asked what was next on the
agenda. She responded, “How Iraq is destabilizing
the region, Mr. President.” O’Neill says that several
observers felt that this interaction with Rice had been scripted.
In the ensuing discussion it became clear that there was a
pre-orchestrated decision to weaken or terminate Saddam’s
regime. O’Neill points out that the Council members discussed
only the hows of the issue and never any of the whys. This
meeting, one must remember, was seven months before September
11, 2001. this unilateral decision to undermine an existing
nation clearly violated as O’Neill notes, Bush’s
campaign promises to be ‘humble’ in our global
involvements and to never engage in ‘nation-building.’
A 27 year analyst with the CIA, Ray McGovern, who is part
of a group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity,
states that the President made the decision to go to war first
and it was then necessary to find the intelligence to validate
the need for that decision. McGovern said that CIA analysts
resisted incredible pressure from the Defense Department to
state that there was evidence of a link between Saddam Hussein
and Osama bin Laden. He went on to say that the administration
had deliberately promoted the false story of Iraq allegedly
seeking to obtain unanium from Nigeria for nuclear arms production
even though that story was a lie based on a forgery.
Confirmationally,
in an article entitled, ‘The New Pentagon
Papers,’ published on the internet news and information
site, Salon.com, a former Lieutenant Colonel in the Air Force
came forth with her observations of what was taking place in
the build up to the war in Iraq. She states that after having
served in the military for 20 years it terminated with ‘10
months of duty in a strange new country...’
She confirms what Ray McGovern stated above. She refers to
individuals in the Pentagon appointed by the President who
manipulated and pressured the interaction between the Pentagon
and intelligence agencies. In her own words:
I witnessed neoconservative agenda bearers within OSP (Office
of Special Plans) usurp measured and carefully considered assessments,
and through suppression and distortion of intelligence analysis
promulgate what were in fact falsehoods to both Congress and
the executive office of the president.
That George
W. Bush would effectively mislead or even lie to others could
easily relate to the effect of Neptune in his
chart this planet creates the propensity for illusion and deception,
including self-deception. compounding this trait is the placement
of Jupiter in the Third House in Bush’s birthchart. When
Jupiter is difficultly aspected, as his is by a square to the
Sun, Hilarion states that such an alignment will lead, generally,
to a ‘dishonest streak.’ Moreover, because this
is the largest planet, Jupiter, these traits of illusion, deception,
and dishonesty can be acted out on a grand scale with far reaching
effects. In correspondence with this grand scale are the plethora
of books which deal with Bush’s tendency to give untrue
and deceptive statements.
The Neptunian
confusion and delusion of George W. Bush are evident in the
following quotes from Suskind’s book which
I think are quite revealing of how George W. Bush functions
as President:
The problem,
O’Neill felt, was that this President’s
lack of inquisitiveness or pertinent experience....meant he
didn’t know or really care about the position of the
U.S. government. It wasn’t just a matter of doing the
opposite of whatever Clinton had done, which was a prevalent
theme throughout the administration. This President was starting
from scratch on most issues and relying on ideologues like
Larry Lindsey, Karl Rove, and, he now feared, his old friend
Dick [Cheney]. Not an honest broker in sight.
The President
was caught in an echo chamber of his own making, cut off
from everyone other than a circle around him that’s
tiny and getting smaller and in concert on everything — a
circle that conceals him from public view and keeps him away
from the one thing he needs most: honest, disinterested perspectives
about what’s real and what the hell he might do about
it.
Seeing
so much of the policy analysis that was being conducted—in
so many realms—left O’Neill befuddled about the
real intentions that underlay action.
Was it possible, O’Neill wondered, that the country thought
it had elected a centrist when in fact it had empowered an
ideologue?
The Neptunian
illusiveness of the true character of George W. Bush is evident
in O’Neill’s observations of
Bush. O’Neill said he could usually grasp the workings
of a prospective employee’s mind after a single lenghty
interview. Yet after working with Bush for six months, O’Neill
felt he still didn’t really understand how Bush’s
mind worked.
Reading ‘The Price of Loyalty’ book provided a
window into what Astrological/Psychological dynamics are at
play at the helm of our nation. Essentially, George W. Bush
is an insecure man, with a complex relationship with his father,
who has used his Leonine and Arian energies of stagecraft,
wit and charm (and a good deal of money) to become President
of the United States. His own insecurity, coupled with his
lack of intellectual engagement and preparation for the task
at hand, have made him compensate by surrounding himself with
powerful and experienced advisors. These ‘handlers’ perpetuate
the stagecraft upon which Bush relies, both for a semblance
of true self-confidence and knowledge, and to also buffer him
from the pragmatic realities around him.
George
W. Bush’s entire life has been based upon appeasing
strong powers around him to compensate for his own insecurities
and inadequacies. These strong powers around him began with
his complex relationship with his father. This legacy continues
to reverberate in most of George W.’s later endeavors.
These strong powers continue to manifest as the political,
religious, and financial forces which enabled George W. to
attain his own political successes.