George W. Bush's Relationship with his Parents
by Steffan Vanel 7/16/04
Here is the next installment in my on-going
interpretation of the Astrological Karma of George W. Bush. See my April
Column, May Column, and June
Column for the first three installments of this series.
I have stated earlier in this book that when
there is an Astrological complex involving difficult aspects
to Neptune it will create
what I call a victim/victimizer program. A program such that
if you don’t want to be a victim you have to be a victimizer.
And if you don’t want to be a victimizer you have to
become a victim. George W.’s experience of this dynamic
is a major Astrological theme in his life and a major concern
in his performance as president today. It is a theme synchronous
with the Neptunian karmic lessons affecting the United States
at this time in its history.
Childhood is where these Astrological complexes are usually
first created. We then have to deal with the various ways that
we unconsciously manifest these complexes in our adult lives.
There is one theme evident in relation to the role of the elder
George Bush in George W.’s childhood. That theme is resonant
with this difficult Neptune/Sun aspect. Hilarion says Neptune
in difficult aspect to the Sun indicates lessons in relation
to the individual’s experience of the masculine principle.
This lesson normally manifests in some difficulty or confusion
in the relationship to the father in the childhood. (The Sun
is often seen to represent the father in a birthchart.)
There is a recurring theme of a certain Neptunian vicitmhood
and vulnerability in George W.’s childhood in his experience of his father. For starters,
throughout the years that George W. was growing up his father was gone a lot.
At first, when the young family moved from New Haven, Connecticutt to Texas
and for a time in California, he was a traveling salesman selling drills to
oil rigs, traveling up to 1,000 miles a week. Then he started into the oil
business himself, searching for property to buy adjacent to where oil strikes
had occurred. For this he would also be away for days at a time. Later George
H. W. Bush started his own oil company for which it has been noted that as
an independent oilman moving into offshore drilling he traveled even more.
Indeed Jeb Bush reflected: “Even when we were growing up in Houston,...Dad
wasn’t at home at night to play catch. Mom was always the one to hand
out the goodies and the discipline. In a sense, it was a matriarchal family.”
This had to have been tough on Barbara as the family increased to five children.
The Moon being square to the Sun in George W.’s birthchart would resonate
with a tension between the parents. Any sense of victimhood experienced by
Barbara Bush would, however, remain unexpressed or unapparent because of the
Moon in Libra’s tendency to manifest a home life which is: ‘superficially
smooth and tranquil but with a cauldron of unresolved conflict and turmoil
beneath the surface.’
In looking back Barbara has begun to express more of how she felt at that time:
"This was a period, for me, of long days and short years,” she would
recall. “Of
diapers, running noses, earaches, more Little League games than you could believe
possible, tonsils, and those unscheduled races to the hospital emergency room...of
feeling that I’d never, ever be able to have fun again; and coping with
the feeling that George Bush, in his excitement of starting a small company
and traveling...was having a lot of fun."
With George the elder’s absence and the fact that George W. was the oldest
child, George W. took on more and more the role of surrogate parent to his
siblings and surrogate partner to Barbara.
“I look back on those years in West Texas,” Barbara recalled, “and
I wonder how I would have ever made it without my oldest son. Thee was never
any groaning or moaning on his part [although he did call her the ‘Gray
Fox’ under his breath when she angered him]. I probably put more responsibility
on him than I should have, especially for a boy his age,” she confessed. “But
whom else could I turn to, with his father gone so much in those days?”
George W.’s own relationship to his father was more distant, but psychologically
more intense:
“If Mom handled misdemeanors, then it was left to the “ultimate enforcer” to
prosecute felonies. “I would scream and carry on,” Barbara said. “The
way George scolded was by silence or by saying, ‘I’m disappointed
in you.’ And they would almost faint.” Georgie would become particularly
upset at the mere suggestion that he might have failed his father. “He
could be made to feel,” Georgie’s brother Marvin said, “that
he had committed the worst crime in history.”
This particularly acute vulnerability to the reality and presence of his father
is a major psychological/karmic dynamic with George W. Bush’s experience
of himself and life. George W.’s Sun, representing the father in a psychological
sense, is in difficult aspect to Neptune, the Moon and Jupiter. Neptune would
relate to the sense of victimhood and vulnerability. The Moon would involve
the mother. And Jupiter would relate to the elder George Bush having such a
major expansive, successful, prominent role in the world around them.
When George W. was born his father was already from a prominent East Coast
family, a war hero, a baseball star, and member of Phi Beta Kappa at Yale.
When they moved to Midland, Texas, the Bushes were the ‘first family’ among
the other Yankees who had moved to that area. One former friend remembered
how everyone called the elder George Bush ‘Big George,’ and how
he “was always the quarterback of the football team, he was immediately
in charge and it was so clear that he was the leader of our group, socially
and intellectually.” Of course later the elder George Bush became an
oil millionaire, a congressman, an ambassador to the U.N. and China, head of
the CIA, Vice President and then President. A lot to live up to for an eldest
son with Leo Ascendant trying to look stronger than he is.
George W. was often the victim of this difficult comparison with the legacy
of his father. He followed in his footsteps but, until much later, never as
successfully as his father. This path would take him to Andover, the prestigious
preparatory school in Massachusetts his father attended. At George W.’s
twentieth reunion at Andover he confessed that during his time there he was
terrified of failing because of how much Andover meant to his father.
George W. then followed his father’s path to Yale, another of his father’s
alma maters, although his acceptance there has been speculatively linked to
family influence. This path also brought him into training as a pilot like
his dad. Unlike his father, however, he was spared any real combat. His promotion
to lieutenant was on the day of his father’s successful election. This
path also brought him to the oil business where he never succeeded like his
father, and what success he did have was probably, again, due to family connections.
One of George W.’s ways of dealing with his insecurities was through
his overindulgence in alcohol. The negative effects of this in relation to
his father manifested one night when he drove home inebriated with his brother
Neil, crashing into the neighbors trash can. His father was waiting for him,
but rather than listen to his father’s lecture: “W. burst into
the room and confronted his father. “I hear you’re looking for
me,” Junior shouted, shaking his fist....”You want to go mano a
mano right here?” As one biographer has stated: “Maybe it was just
the alcohol talking. Or maybe it was the nagging frustration of a young man
who had come to realize how hard it was to measure up and come to worry about
how easy it was to disappoint.”
Later George W. claimed that he finally gave up alcohol because it was competing
with his affections for his wife and family. These are definitely valid reasons
for someone with the Sun in Cancer. Other observers, however, have stated that
his motives had more to do with not wanting to disappoint or cause problems
for his father, especially as his father started to express ambitions for the
presidency.
The experience of the roles of victim and victimizer became more complex in
George W.’s relationship to his father when he had to witness the successful,
bigger than life George Herbert Walker Bush experiencing his own humiliating
defeats and victimizations. He had to witness the abuse and accusations his
father had to deal with in his Texan political campaigns. At Yale his father,
who supported the war in Vietnam, was condemned by the anti-war students and
the liberal faculty.
Later George W. took on more and more the role of victimizer
of those whom he felt had victimized his father. He was known to be the strong
arm man in his father’s 1988 presidential campaign, letting reporters
have a ‘piece of his mind’ if they wrote unflattering or critical
articles about his father. Unhappy with one journalist’s comments, George
W. accosted the reporter and his family during their dinner in a restaurant
and yelled: “You no good fucking son of a bitch! I will never fucking
forget what you wrote!” What this journalist had written was simply that
he thought that Jack Kemp was going to get the Republican nomination for president
in 1988. He didn’t even mention George Bush in the article. This may
seem a minor incident, but I think it is symbolic of a profound psychological
dynamic within George W. Bush. It has been conjectured that at least one of
George W.’s motivations in running for Governor of Texas was to get back
at the incumbent Governor, Ann Richardson, who had stated at the Democratic
National Convention nominating Bill Clinton in 1992 that George Herbert Walker
Bush was ‘born with a silver foot in his mouth.’ When George W.
announced to his mother that he was running against Ann Richardson her first
reaction was ‘Go get her.’
It is also speculated that George W.’s run for the presidency was, at
least in part, to get back at Clinton and the Democrats for what they did to
his father in 1992. I am sure that George W. has his own sense of service and
duty and it has been noted that there were others who put pressure on him to
run. One has to ask in the present political climate, however, what really
motivates someone to run for president? And, how will those, perhaps, unconscious
motives affect their choices and performance as president? Was George W. Bush’s
attack on Saddam Hussein somehow connected with a festering malice resulting
from Saddam’s threat to assasinate his father the first President George
Bush?